logo
  • Home
  • Europa-Tagebuch
  • Digital Humanities
  • Europa-Bilder
  • Noch mehr Europa
    • Feuilleton
    • Urfassungen
    • Gastbeiträge
  • Über mich

European Union Future For Western Balkans Countries (Part II)

Datum: 06 Dez 2019
Von: Wolfgang Schmale
Tags: EU enlargement, Serbia, Western Balkans
Kommentare: Comments are off

Part I was published on 5 December 2019.

Part III was published on 7 December 2019.

From 1 to 4 December 2019 I was on a promotional tour in Serbia for the Serbian edition of my book „Was wird aus der Europäischen Union? Geschichte und Zukunft„. A total of five newspaper interviews, one radio and one television interview had to be conducted as well as four lecture and discussion events.

The topic of EU accession is clearly a hot topic in Serbia, since the accession process is not coming off the mark. The EU is not particularly interested in accelerating the process, but may underestimate the frustration in the Western Balkans and the risks.

The lecture to Matica Srpska, Novi Sad, on 3 December dealt with the question of the EU future of the Western Balkan countries in a broader context.

Thesis II: The EU is Europe’s most dynamic force,
so it is good to be a member

[31] After the Second World War, numerous European and international organisations were founded. The European Coal and Steel Community was limited to 50 years, it ended in 2002; the Western European Union, founded in 1948, ended in 2011 – both organisations have to some extent merged into the EU. The EFTA (European Free Trade Association), founded in 1960 and less binding than the EEC founded in 1957, still exists, but three of the last four members, Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein, are also members of the EEA (European Economic Area), an „EU light“ with 30 or 31 members.

[32] The Council for Mutual Economic Assistance existed from 1949 to 1991, while its western counterpart, the OEEC, founded in 1948, continues to exist under the slightly changed name of OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development).

[33] In the meantime, the Eurasian Economic Union (2014) has been founded under the leadership of the Russian Federation, to which Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan also belong. Other more recent foundations, to which Serbia also belongs, are the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (since 1992) and the CEFTA (Central European Free Trade Agreement) (also since 1992 with a greatly changed membership).

[34] Founded in Belgrade in 1961, the Non-Aligned Movement, which still exists today, extended beyond Europe from the outset. The UN was the successor to the League of Nations; the latter had been strongly European in character, and the UN was international from the outset, but no less important for Europe.

[35] The largest organization in terms of the number of member countries today is the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation), which comprises 57 states. Some are located at least geographically only partly in Europe, such as the Russian Federation and Turkey, and not in Europe, such as Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Canada, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, the USA. After the Second World War, the OSCE or its predecessor, the CSCE, was the first joint, predominantly European organization of the two blocs, and through it human rights, civil rights and the rule of law became a decisive basis for the idea of European unity.

[36] Founded in 1949, the Council of Europe is the second largest organisation with 47 member countries, but Belarus is not one of them. Kosovo is not one of them because, unlike Belarus, it is not recognised as a state by all countries. Canada, Japan, Mexico and the USA have observer status, as do Israel and the Holy See. The Europe of the Council of Europe should be built above all through human rights, the promotion of culture and, in particular, of young people.

[37] Finally, the EU, in principle the youngest European organisation, founded in 1992 with the Treaty of Maastricht, which does of course date back to the EEC of 1957.

[38] The EU is one of the largest economic powers in the world. Citizens can move freely within the EU because of European citizenship rights, they can live and work where they want, they enjoy the same rights everywhere. The EU is not yet a state of its own, but it now has many of the characteristics of a state, which benefits the economy, people and culture.

[39] One of the EU’s most important objectives remains to increase prosperity across the EU. This is difficult and lengthy, but there have been many successes. Those who belong to the EU are part of a solidarity community and benefit from the money that the members pay into the EU budget. The economically weaker countries receive subsidies that are higher than their contribution to the budget. This is probably one aspect that makes the EU particularly attractive for accession.

[40] It is also true that the EU contributes to the maintenance of peace. War has become pointless because peace in the EU is the only source of great wealth.

[41] The EU forms a common judicial area in which legal stability prevails. That is particularly valuable today when you look at countries where arbitrariness is the norm: Russian Federation, China, Turkey, USA, etc. If the economy is to flourish, it needs legal stability, and people need to be sure that their rights are guaranteed and protected.

[42] The EU stands for a particular model of society as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union: „The values on which the Union is founded are respect for human dignity, liberty, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to all Member States in a society characterised by pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men“.

[43] Unfortunately, such a social model is now being violently combated by many states. Among those should be mentioned critically some important „partners“ of the EU, the Russian Federation, China, Turkey and the current US government which.

[44] Every country wishing to join the EU must check for itself whether it is in line with this model of society. Living pluralism and non-discrimination requires a national effort. It is not only the government of a country that must want this, but also its citizens. And we must be prepared to defend this social model against its opponents.

[45] The EU also makes it clear that „Europe“ – to be more precise: „European Union“ – today means more than Europe. On the one hand, today’s 27 respectively 28 members belong geographically completely to Europe, on the other hand, several member countries like France still have overseas territories despite the end of colonialism. The EU, for example, borders directly on Canada, since the islands of St. Pierre et Miquelon are French. Not to mention the possessions of EU countries in the Caribbean or the Pacific, not to mention the Spanish exclaves Ceuta and Melilla in northern Morocco.

[46] Many countries on earth now have a close relationship with the EU without being members. This must be taken into account when defining exactly what the EU is. It is more than the 27 or 28 member countries. It is less and less about Europe, but more and more about a global context.

[47] As the world grew larger in the 15th century from a European perspective, Europe was increasingly defined by demarcation and the description of differences. In our time, the opposite is happening: Europe is becoming more and more global and defining itself globally. Of course, demarcations still play a role, but they run along global lines.

[48] This brief historical retrospective shows that whoever wants to join the EU today joins less a European organisation than a global one. When, after 1945, the old dream of common European political institutions came true, the rules of the game for the idea of Europe changed. The adjective „European“ in the name „European Union“ refers to the origin and seat of the Union in Europe, but now means much more than just Europe.

Documentation: The programme of the promotional tour has been organized by Clio publishers (Belgrade). For the round table at the Institute of European Studies, Belgrade, see the institute’s homepage. The round table was organized by the institute’s director dr Miša Đurković.

Reference: Wolfgang Schmale: European Union Future for Western Balkans Countries, in: Mein Europa, Blog: https://wolfgangschmale.eu/european-union-future-for-western-balkans-countries-2.

Teilen
  • google-share

Suche


Neueste Beiträge

  • Europa 2022 – Eine Bilanz
  • Europa fährt Achterbahn und spielt weiter Kindergarten
  • Wird die EU den Willen aufbringen, sich tatsächlich zu erweitern? Ukraine, Moldau, Westbalkan, Georgien
  • Über: Marlene Streeruwitz: „Handbuch gegen den Krieg.“
  • Die EU zwischen „Europäischer Souveränität“ und globaler Verflechtung

Neueste Kommentare

  • Peter Nemschak bei The EU’s Geopolitical Hideout in Myanmar – Georg Bauer on Borrell’s blog post on Myanmar
  • Alexander Burstein bei Digitaler Humanismus – Lehren aus Covid-19
  • Gerhard Kaucic bei Theorie des Digitalen Zeitalters
  • Alexander Burstein bei Den Rassismus auf Abstand halten
  • Alexander Burstein bei Der EU-Gipfel 17. Juli bis 21. Juli 2020 – Pyrrhussieg oder zukunftsfähige EU? Jedenfalls kein historisches Datum…

Archiv

  • Dezember 2022 (1)
  • Oktober 2022 (1)
  • Juni 2022 (1)
  • Mai 2022 (1)
  • April 2022 (1)
  • März 2022 (1)
  • Februar 2022 (3)
  • Dezember 2021 (5)
  • November 2021 (3)
  • Oktober 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (2)
  • Januar 2021 (1)
  • Dezember 2020 (3)
  • Oktober 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • Juli 2020 (2)
  • Juni 2020 (1)
  • Mai 2020 (3)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • März 2020 (3)
  • Februar 2020 (2)
  • Januar 2020 (1)
  • Dezember 2019 (5)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • Oktober 2019 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • Juli 2019 (4)
  • Juni 2019 (1)
  • Mai 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • März 2019 (2)
  • Februar 2019 (2)
  • Januar 2019 (3)
  • Dezember 2018 (4)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • Oktober 2018 (2)
  • September 2018 (3)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • Juli 2018 (3)
  • Juni 2018 (5)
  • Mai 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • März 2018 (4)
  • Februar 2018 (5)
  • Januar 2018 (2)
  • Dezember 2017 (6)
  • November 2017 (3)
  • Oktober 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (2)
  • Juli 2017 (2)
  • Juni 2017 (2)
  • Mai 2017 (5)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • März 2017 (4)
  • Februar 2017 (4)
  • Januar 2017 (3)
  • Dezember 2016 (3)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • Oktober 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (3)
  • August 2016 (3)
  • Juli 2016 (3)
  • Juni 2016 (3)
  • Mai 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (4)
  • März 2016 (4)
  • Februar 2016 (4)
  • Januar 2016 (3)
  • Dezember 2015 (4)
  • November 2015 (4)
  • Oktober 2015 (5)
  • September 2015 (4)
  • August 2015 (3)
  • Juli 2015 (4)
  • Juni 2015 (4)
  • Mai 2015 (5)
  • April 2015 (4)

Schlagwörter

8. Mai 1945 18. Jahrhundert Antoine Vauchez Armenier Brexit Bundesverfassungsgericht Corona Covid-19 Democracy Demokratie; Digital Humanities EU EU enlargement Europa Europäische Identität Europäische Kultur Europäisches Kulturerbejahr 2018 europäische Solidarität Europäische Union Flüchtlinge Frankreich Genozid Geschichte Grexit Griechenland; Holocaust Kultur Martin Schulz Mein Europa Menschenrechte Narrative Nationalismus Osmanisches Reich Paris Philipp Ther Polen Praxeologie Solidarität; Staat Türkei Ungarn Vielfalt Warschau Western Balkans Wiener Kongress
RSS abonieren
  • Datenschutz
  • Impressum
  • Links
Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International Lizenz.

Webdesign
www.media-solutions.at

© Wolfgang Schmale, Universität Wien
Cookie-Zustimmung verwalten
Um dir ein optimales Erlebnis zu bieten, verwenden wir Technologien wie Cookies, um Geräteinformationen zu speichern und/oder darauf zuzugreifen. Wenn du diesen Technologien zustimmst, können wir Daten wie das Surfverhalten oder eindeutige IDs auf dieser Website verarbeiten. Wenn du deine Zustimmung nicht erteilst oder zurückziehst, können bestimmte Merkmale und Funktionen beeinträchtigt werden.
Funktional Immer aktiv
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugang ist unbedingt erforderlich für den rechtmäßigen Zweck, die Nutzung eines bestimmten Dienstes zu ermöglichen, der vom Teilnehmer oder Nutzer ausdrücklich gewünscht wird, oder für den alleinigen Zweck, die Übertragung einer Nachricht über ein elektronisches Kommunikationsnetz durchzuführen.
Vorlieben
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff ist für den rechtmäßigen Zweck der Speicherung von Präferenzen erforderlich, die nicht vom Abonnenten oder Benutzer angefordert wurden.
Statistiken
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff, der ausschließlich zu statistischen Zwecken erfolgt. Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff, der ausschließlich zu anonymen statistischen Zwecken verwendet wird. Ohne eine Vorladung, die freiwillige Zustimmung deines Internetdienstanbieters oder zusätzliche Aufzeichnungen von Dritten können die zu diesem Zweck gespeicherten oder abgerufenen Informationen allein in der Regel nicht dazu verwendet werden, dich zu identifizieren.
Marketing
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff ist erforderlich, um Nutzerprofile zu erstellen, um Werbung zu versenden oder um den Nutzer auf einer Website oder über mehrere Websites hinweg zu ähnlichen Marketingzwecken zu verfolgen.
Optionen verwalten Dienste verwalten Anbieter verwalten Lese mehr über diese Zwecke
Einstellungen ansehen
{title} {title} {title}